server rule update.
+20
stormy4528
Bagger
Smurf_cfc
Sandert
MasterG
Bezzer_1
Nixy23
capitan
Tarranauha200
Zer0
H.sta
Viglen
MIDGET
Voodoo
Chris_Kampfgurke
Crenshaw
kerrermanisNL
Zach
Jay Scott
Orford
24 posters
Page 1 of 1
server rule update.
server rules have been updated.
No main attack in INS mode at all.
Please refresh your knowledge of the server rules.
No main attack in INS mode at all.
Please refresh your knowledge of the server rules.
Orford- Orford
- Registration date : 2008-10-29
Re: server rule update.
Finally! I have been waiting so long for this. Now I can participate in infantry combat on Lashkar without having to defend the main .
I do have one question: Is one allowed to fire a weapon with intent to kill an enemy from inside one's own main base? I'll use Fallujah West as an example because there was always "discussion" in-game about an APC firing from within the Hescos on the north side of the base. Will this be legal? What about a sniper or HAT engaging enemies at the "alpha 6 compound"?
I do have one question: Is one allowed to fire a weapon with intent to kill an enemy from inside one's own main base? I'll use Fallujah West as an example because there was always "discussion" in-game about an APC firing from within the Hescos on the north side of the base. Will this be legal? What about a sniper or HAT engaging enemies at the "alpha 6 compound"?
Zach- Registration date : 2011-11-19
Re: server rule update.
I think the main issue Klutz was the 50.cal techy into main. Fallujah doesn't have any 50.cals and i have never witnessed Insurgents shooting into fallujah's base?
I don't think Fallujah will course much bother if am honest.
I don't think Fallujah will course much bother if am honest.
Jay Scott- Registration date : 2010-10-12
Re: server rule update.
They will be asked to move away from the spawn. If they continue to shoot out of main to abuse the no main attack by INS I'll personally fist them!
Covering fire to assault the compound will attract returning fire from INS so the west gate is a tough call.
It's been a tough thing todo so we will keep an eye on them, the excuse "We are defending main" is no longer valid.
It will take a while to get used too so it will hopefully be admined accordingly.
Covering fire to assault the compound will attract returning fire from INS so the west gate is a tough call.
It's been a tough thing todo so we will keep an eye on them, the excuse "We are defending main" is no longer valid.
It will take a while to get used too so it will hopefully be admined accordingly.
Orford- Orford
- Registration date : 2008-10-29
Re: server rule update.
Orford wrote:[T]he excuse "We are defending main" is no longer valid.
That's what I wanted to hear. I'm quite certain it will be admin'd properly.
Zach- Registration date : 2011-11-19
Re: server rule update.
You know... I just realized -- despite the fact that prior to this we were free to wail on their main outside of Area Attack/Bomb Vehicles, I never did it. I always considered it to be dirty and because I wouldn't like it to happen to me I didn't do it to other people.
Just an interesting realization.
Just an interesting realization.
Crenshaw- *NwA* Admin
- Registration date : 2011-07-23
Re: server rule update.
Jay Scott wrote:I think the main issue Klutz was the 50.cal techy into main. Fallujah doesn't have any 50.cals and i have never witnessed Insurgents shooting into fallujah's base?
I don't think Fallujah will course much bother if am honest.
*COUGH COUGH* Tarra *COUGH COUGH*
Voodoo- *NwA* Clan Member
- Registration date : 2010-12-02
Re: server rule update.
Crenshaw wrote:You know... I just realized -- despite the fact that prior to this we were free to wail on their main outside of Area Attack/Bomb Vehicles, I never did it. I always considered it to be dirty and because I wouldn't like it to happen to me I didn't do it to other people.
Just an interesting realization.
Because there are others who dont see it the same way, it has become a problem. Try flying or being the squad who gets called back to main to take out the 50cal or snipers killing people in main.
Game play killer.
Orford- Orford
- Registration date : 2008-10-29
Re: server rule update.
read and understood
as i understoof the previous rule it was only small arms allowed so 50 cal and high velocity rifles are not allowed????
as i understoof the previous rule it was only small arms allowed so 50 cal and high velocity rifles are not allowed????
MIDGET- Registration date : 2011-11-08
Re: server rule update.
so instead of changing rules all the time we could simply ban Terra?
hmm...
hmm...
H.sta- Registration date : 2010-12-04
Re: server rule update.
with 50 cal...
i taught only small arms fire was allowed...back in the raping days
Zer0- *NwA* Admin
- Registration date : 2010-09-29
Re: server rule update.
At least when mixed server was on it was allowed.
Tarranauha200- Registration date : 2010-05-02
Re: server rule update.
Tarranauha200 wrote:This rule was originally made becoase of me me and now its changed becoase of me .
I can still remember driving bombcars and garys in kokan US main and killing everything inside. Some time after that there was "no bombcar/bombcar in main"
Now its changed further coz I raped choppas on pad.
And apparently you still can't take a hint Stop using cheap tactics to win and play like a man!
Nixy23- Registration date : 2011-05-01
Re: server rule update.
As an admin: Understood.
As the dude that actually defends the bases: Come on man, it's so funny shooting ducks crawling on the hills.. hehe
As an Insurgent: Where is the fun in that?
And to agree with H.sta, why not just ban tarra and return the rules to how they were? :p hehe.
As the dude that actually defends the bases: Come on man, it's so funny shooting ducks crawling on the hills.. hehe
As an Insurgent: Where is the fun in that?
And to agree with H.sta, why not just ban tarra and return the rules to how they were? :p hehe.
MasterG- *NwA* Clan Member
- Registration date : 2010-10-29
Re: server rule update.
Awesome decision. Rule caused more harm than it did good (techies killing choppers got old real fast).
Only problem with new rule is the north gate of Fallujah US main but that's the mapper's fault.
Only problem with new rule is the north gate of Fallujah US main but that's the mapper's fault.
Sandert- *NwA* Clan Member
- Registration date : 2011-05-14
Re: server rule update.
MasterG wrote:
And to agree with H.sta, why not just ban tarra and return the rules to how they were? :p hehe.
Don't want to give the nub the satisfaction.
Orford- Orford
- Registration date : 2008-10-29
Re: server rule update.
will spread the word to pubbers if needed, G was on the money didnt see this rule as a huge game wrecker.
Smurf_cfc- Registration date : 2011-07-13
Re: server rule update.
Seams that the people who don't fly or ever take it on themselves to fall back and take out the ins attacking the main to say that.
Oh hum life goes on.
Oh hum life goes on.
Orford- Orford
- Registration date : 2008-10-29
Re: server rule update.
i beleave small arms fire should be allowed but hay ho
MIDGET- Registration date : 2011-11-08
Re: server rule update.
This is interesting because i never actually encountered anyone firing into main, however i could imagine anything other than sporadic small arms fire into main could become quite the bother as i see the main as a place to lay back and organise.. if you're having to worry about bomb cars coming round the corner and bleeding 100 tickets... good idea in my opinion. it must be administered strictly however.
stormy4528- *NwA* Clan Member
- Registration date : 2011-09-07
Re: server rule update.
Crenshaw wrote:You know... I just realized -- despite the fact that prior to this we were free to wail on their main outside of Area Attack/Bomb Vehicles, I never did it. I always considered it to be dirty and because I wouldn't like it to happen to me I didn't do it to other people.
Just an interesting realization.
Had the same thing mate
kerrermanisNL- Registration date : 2011-08-06
Re: server rule update.
kerrermanisNL wrote:Crenshaw wrote:You know... I just realized -- despite the fact that prior to this we were free to wail on their main outside of Area Attack/Bomb Vehicles, I never did it. I always considered it to be dirty and because I wouldn't like it to happen to me I didn't do it to other people.
Just an interesting realization.
Had the same thing mate
+1
Naughtiest thing I ever did was just for lulz.
This was aaaaaaaaaaaaages ago (Uploaded Oct 25, filmed at least a month before it) with Sincoza flying, we both got angry at the fact Ins can attack our main (This was the next chopper after our Huey getting shot down for the 93483th thousandth time on takeoff) and dished out a little payback.
Voodoo- *NwA* Clan Member
- Registration date : 2010-12-02
Re: server rule update.
Why is there Eastenders on in the background ?
Danger_6- Registration date : 2011-07-18
Re: server rule update.
Bownty wrote:Smurf was on
I laughed so hard at that.. and the funny thing is it's true 95% of the time. That man must have plenty of box sets.
Voodoo- *NwA* Clan Member
- Registration date : 2010-12-02
Similar topics
» Rule update!!!!!!!!!!!
» About enforcing server rule n.1
» INS Server Vehicle Rule Clarification
» Win a months free slot on PR server if you Kill a Red Admin on our New Dayz server
» AAS Rule clarification
» About enforcing server rule n.1
» INS Server Vehicle Rule Clarification
» Win a months free slot on PR server if you Kill a Red Admin on our New Dayz server
» AAS Rule clarification
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum